Tom Harkin: restore majority rule in the Senate


Dear Robert,
When many people think of the filibuster, they think of the 1939 film Mr. Smith Goes to Washington. In this classic, Senator Smith talks ceaselessly on the Senate floor to stand up for the little guy against the special interests. It's an unusual and dramatic scene.
Today, that scene has been turned upside down. Senate Republicans routinely use the filibuster to block anything and everything they dislike -- no matter how uncontroversial or critical it is -- to protect special interests at the expense of the little guy.
Thankfully, the Senate has an opportunity to fix the filibuster next week, and I -- along with Senators Jeff Merkley and Tom Udall -- plan to do it.
Defenders of this kind of obstruction like to point to the traditions of the Senate in support of their cynical actions. But our founding fathers didn't have the ability to filibuster and they explicitly rejected a supermajority requirement as antithetical to democracy.
The fact is, our founding fathers would be shocked and dismayed that the minority party, through abuse of the filibuster, essentially controls the agenda of the Senate without any burden of accountability.
And it's getting worse. In the 20 years between 1950 and 1969 there were only 20 filibusters; In the last six years, there have been more than 380!
We can fix this, but we have to act now. Next week -- on the first legislative day of the new Senate session -- we can fix the filibuster with just a simple majority vote, and my colleagues need to hear from you.
For me, filibuster reform isn’t about one party gaining an advantage. It is about the Senate operating more fairly, effectively, and democratically.
My filibuster reform proposal -- which I first introduced in 1995 when Democrats were in the minority -- reduces the number of senators needed to end an extended filibuster and allows a simple majority to pass legislation after ample debate and deliberation.
Another proposal to fix the filibuster from Senators Merkley and Udall -- which I also support -- would require Senators to actually talk to sustain a filibuster, rather than just threatening to do it.
Neither proposal represents a radical change to the Senate. What's been a radical change is Republicans' consistent abuse of the filibuster as a tool for obstruction.
But with obstructionist Republicans dead set against reform, and even some Senate Democrats reluctant to change the rules, we still face an uphill battle. That’s why I need your help right now.
Together, we can restore majority rule in the Senate. Thank you for your help.
Sincerely,
Tom Harkin
U.S. Senator

This Week's 🔥Topics

Donald Jr: My dad called it what it is.. Weinergate

Michelle Obama: the girls and I would like to do something a little different.

Col Shames: Have you ever seen this picture?

Stephanie Cutter: this is no ordinary election.

Heidi: give Catherine the resources she needs to win

Jill: Moving Forward with a bigger party and bigger plans.

Black Conservatives: a powerful strategy.

Jennifer Petty: We have to fight back

protecting our House Majority DEPENDS on protecting Cheri Bustos.